Sunday, January 11, 2026

Marxist spotlight from India

by Robin MacGregor

Revolutionary Democracy new series Vol. II; No. 2 (October 2025) £7.50 including p&p from NCP Lit, PO Box 73, London SW11 2PQ
 
 The October 2025 issue of Revolutionary Democracy has safely arrived in London for New Worker readers to acquire their own copy. It contains the usual mixture of material on past and present South Asian politics, archival material and statements from Conference of Marxist-Leninist Parties and Organisations’ members on various issues such Bolivia and the Middle East. 
 In the first category there is an interesting short piece on overthrow of the Maoist Nepali government which is blamed on “the old elites of Nepal, the military bureaucracy complex, hiding under the banner of the youth protest”. A regular RD contributor, C N Subramaniam writes on the BJP Government’s drastic watering down of India’s labour laws. A shorter piece describes the same government’s disenfranchising masses in the state of Bihar by demanding that potential voters present a plethora of documents to get on the electoral role. These new regulations were introduced because the BJP failed to secure a majority in the Hindi speaking state. This would never happen in Britain where Sir Keir Starmer simply cancels those elections he knows he will lose. 
 Much of this issue is devoted to the life and times of Badruddin Umar (1931-2025), an Oxford educated veteran of the Bangladesh communist movement. His politically engaged family emigrated from India to what was then East Pakistan in 1951 to escape the post-Independence communal violence. His career as a lecturer in several universities was abandoned in favour of political activism. Among other things he edited the East Pakistan Communist Party (ML)’s weekly and was president of the Bangladesh Peasant Federation. He long opposed the country’s ruling Awami League and the welcoming of multinational corporations who developed the country’s highly exploitative garment industry. He was also no friend of the present regime, a fact made evident in his own article on the Post-July uprising in Bangladesh.
 Of specialist issue are two articles devoted to the 1975 resignation of the first General Secretary of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) and the political lessons which are to be learnt from that episode. Another is an interesting review of a book entitled Stalin and Indonesia. Soviet Policy Towards Indonesia, originally published in Russian 22 years ago, that provides a useful summary of a neglected but important topic.
This long-standing Indian Marxist journal supports a particularly dogmatic trend in the world communist movement and so it’s not surprising to see that nature of the Chinese state is the focus of an article entitled Capitalism with Chinese Characteristics by the New York based Towards Marxist Leninist Unity group. Less controversial is a shorter piece equally appropriately entitled Trump is a continuation of the politics of imperialism, albeit in decline as well as a topical article on Developments in the Middle East by Hamma Hammami from the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP).
 Another instalment of extracts from a 1937 Soviet book by A V Shchegolov on the Soviet philosopher Alexander Bogdanov (1973-1928) is provided while the main archival material in this issue concerns talks held between Joseph Stalin and Kim Il Sung held in both 1949 and 1952. 
 These are prefaced by an introductory article by RD Editor Vijay Singh in which he claims the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) never became a proper dictatorship of the proletariat because is allowed rich peasants to be involved in co-operative farms. This is a controversial point which the UK Korean Friendship Association took issue with in a substantial critique in a December 2025 blog posting. 
 The March 1949 talks were largely concerned with previous and future Soviet aid to the DPRK was discussed. The the military strength of the DPRK, which was to be a vital matter the next year was also discussed. In September 1952 the talks, which also included the Chinese, were more urgent due to the war against the Americans being in progress. Here the military situation is discussed in detail, along with essential Soviet and Chinese aid which finally ensured a humiliating defeat for the Americans, something for which they have never forgiven the Korean people.
 We also get a 1944 letter from Josip Broz Tito, the head of the Yugoslav resistance during the Second World War, to the Bulgarian communist leader Georgi Dimitrov about the progress of the national liberation struggles in the Balkans.
 Finally, this issue continues with publishing documents relating to relations between the Soviet party and the Communist Party of India. In this case 1952 discussions related to the Indian parties internal troubles and its political strategy.  Regardless of the merit some of the viewpoints expressed here this issue provides much useful information and food for thought.  

Revolutionary Democracy is a half-yearly theoretical and political journal from India. It contains material on the problems facing the communist movement, particularly relating to Russia, China and India, the origins of modern revisionism, the restoration of capitalism in the USSR and developments in the international communist movement.

Saturday, January 10, 2026

Stand by Venezuela!

Last year Donald Trump told the world he deserved to get the Nobel Peace Prize. A few weeks ago he dubbed himself the “President of Peace”. Now he seems to have had second thoughts. He’s kicked off the New Year by raiding Caracas to seize the Venezuelan leader for a show trial in New York on trumped up charges of drug trafficking. He says he’s going to “run” Venezuela and take all their oil. He tells us that Colombia and Cuba are next on the list along with Greenland, which is an autonomous part of Denmark – an American ally and member of NATO. He justifies all this by saying he’s applying a modernised version of the Monroe Doctrine of 1823, which asserts Washington’s “right” to control the entire Western Hemisphere, that he now modestly calls the “Donroe” doctrine.
We’ll he can kiss his Nobel prize goodbye though this immensely vain man doubtless now imagines that throwing his weight around in the Caribbean puts him in the same league as Alexander the Great and Napoleon. Others dismiss him as a senile old man with delusions of grandeur. But at the end of the day it’s not what Trump thinks that counts – it’s what those who put him back into the White House want.
The Trump administration seeks to “Make America Great Again”, largely at the expense of its own allies, and boost American manufacturing through tariffs and protectionism while using secret diplomacy, military force and economic blackmail to achieve its goals. Gone are the days of the “West”, the “special relationship” and the “new world order”. British and Franco-German imperialism once believed that accepting American leadership would give them a share of the spoils.  But the “West” has gone. They can scrabble around with their “coalition of the willing” all they like. They’ll get nothing from Trump & Co.
American “isolationism” means Big Oil, Silicon Valley, Aerospace and the rest of their manufacturing sector. It’s the other side of the reactionary coin – the thinking of those sections of the American ruling class that realise that world domination is beyond their grasp and so seek to restore their hegemony in the Americas  and much of the Global South while maintaining their control of the world’s oil and energy market. But even this may soon prove to be beyond their reach.
When the Americans moved to normalise relations with People’s China in 1972 the Chinese side stressed that “wherever there is oppression, there is resistance. Countries want independence, nations want liberation and the people want revolution – this has become the irresistible trend of history”.
It was true then and it’s true now. Most of the Donbas is free. The Ukrainian fascists are on their last legs. The Israelis have failed to crush the Palestinian resistance in Gaza. The Venezuelan government has not collapsed. 
The world communist movement says imperialist aggression must be confronted. Maduro must be immediately and unconditionally freed and all the revolutionary, working-class and popular forces of the world must mobilise and express active solidarity with the Venezuelan people resisting American aggression.

Tuesday, January 06, 2026

Down with the Imperialist boot in Venezuela and Latin America!

Joint Statement by Communist and Workers’ Parties
 
The undersigned Communist and Workers’ Parties strongly condemn the criminal bombings carried out by the United States against the city of Caracas and other areas of Venezuela in the early hours of 3 January. This military imperialist attack constitutes a serious violation of the sovereignty of an independent state and is directed against the interests of the people of Venezuela and other peoples of the region. 
The operation included the illegal and violent arrest, transfer, and imprisonment in the USA of Nicolás Maduro and Cilia Flores, an unacceptable and reprehensible act that violates every concept of international law, effectively rendering it meaningless. Consequently, we demand his immediate release. 
This attack is not an isolated incident, but rather the culmination of years of sanctions, threats, blockades, and destabilization efforts. The real objective was never the defence of human rights, nor the supposed fight against drug trafficking, nor the rhetoric of “democracy”, all of which serve merely as pretexts. The true aim has been the direct imposition of the geopolitical and economic interests of US imperialism in Venezuela and the region, within the context of the struggle among capitalist powers for control over energy resources, strategic raw materials, trade routes, and markets. 
In a cynical and shameless manner, Donald Trump declared that the United States would "run" Venezuela until a so-called “transition” was completed. This statement exposes the imperialist nature of his plan and confirms the real motives behind this aggression: the control of Venezuela’s oil and natural resources and the imposition of his plan for economic, political, and military control over the entire continent. We categorically reject this plan of imposition and this so-called democracy enforced through the use of armed force. 
We warn that Venezuela is being used as an example, and that a strong response is required to confront imperialist aggression, which has been carried out in such a brutal manner and with barbaric military means against the people of Venezuela and all the peoples of Latin America and the Caribbean. 
We demand an immediate end to the military aggression against Venezuela, the withdrawal of US troops from the Caribbean, and full respect for the sovereignty, self-determination, and territorial integrity of the Venezuelan people.
We call upon the revolutionary, working-class, and popular forces of the world to mobilize and express active solidarity with Venezuela against this new bellicose escalation of attacks by US imperialism. 
We condemn the direct threats issued by US Secretary of State Marco Rubio against Cuba following the intervention in Venezuela, and we express our solidarity with the people and the Communist Party of Cuba. 
 
Unity of the peoples against imperialist barbarity! 
Proletarians of all countries, unite! 

 
SolidNet Parties signing the Joint Statement
 
  1. PADS, Algeria
  2. Communist Party of Australia
  3. Party of Labour of Austria
  4. Communist Party of Bangladesh
  5. Brazilian Communist Party
  6. Communist Party of Britain
  7. New Communist Party of Britain
  8. Communist Party of Canada
  9. Socialist Workers' Party of Croatia
  10. Communist Party of Bohemia & Moravia
  11. Communist Party of Denmark
  12. Communist Party of Ecuador
  13. Egyptian Communist Party
  14. Communist Party of El Salvador
  15. Communist Party of Greece
  16. Communist Party of India 
  17. Iraqi Communist Party
  18. Communist party of Kurdistan-Iraq 
  19. Tudeh Party of Iran
  20. Communist Party of Ireland
  21. Workers Party of Ireland
  22. Communist Party of Israel
  23. Jordanian Communist Party
  24. Socialist Movement of Kazakhstan
  25. Lebanese Communist Party
  26. Communist Party of Mexico
  27. New Communist Party of the Netherlands
  28. Communist Party of Norway
  29. Paraguayan Communist Party
  30. Palestinian Communist Party
  31. Palestinian People Party
  32. Romanian Socialist Party
  33. Communists of Serbia
  34. Communist Party of the Workers of Spain
  35. Sudanese Communist Party
  36. Communist Party of Sweden
  37. Swiss Communist Party
  38. Syrian Communist Party
  39. Syrian Communist Party [Unified]
  40. Communist Party of Turkey
  41. Communist Party of Ukraine
  42. Union of communists of Ukraine
  43. Communist Party USA
  44. Communist Party of Venezuela

 

Other Parties

  1. Argentinian Communist Party
  2. New Communist Party of Australia
  3. Revolutionary Brazilian Communist Party
  4. Patriotic Movement Manuel Rodríguez, Chile
  5. National Commission for the Reorganization of the Communist Party of Ecuador
  6. Revolutionary Communist Party of France
  7. Revolutionary Party - Communists (France)
  8. Communist Party (Germany)
  9. Communist Front (Italy)
  10. Organisation of Communists, Russia
  11. Russian Communist Party (Internationalists)
  12. Communist Workers' Platform USA

 
 

Wednesday, December 31, 2025

Greece’s Broken Democracy and the Fightback from the Streets

the fightback begins
by our Balkan Affairs correspondent

What was meant to be Greece’s “Economic Miracle” has ended up being a catalogue of scandals, tight executive control, no government oversight and shocking examples of corruption and tragic incidents that has led to many deaths. But there had to come a point where the masses fought back and that point has finally come.
European authorities promote Greece as a “post crisis success story”. Yet Kyriakos Mitsotakis’ right-wing government relies on spyware and the flagrant misuse of EU subsidies and is now overseeing a brutal cost-of-living crisis.
On the night of his election victory on 7 July 2019, new prime minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis declared that Greece was “returning to normal.” Leader of the right-wing New Democracy party, Mitsotakis promised a government of the “best and brightest” and drew a line under the previous four years of Syriza rule, vowing to erase its legacy piece by piece.
More than six years on, Mitsotakis’s tenure has become a cesspool marred by corruption, financial mismanagement, illegal surveillance, cover-ups, abuse of European Union funds, manipulation of the justice system, and a tightly controlled propaganda machine financed through state resources. It’s something that hasn’t  been seen since the fall of the military dictatorship. 
Mitsotakis came to power promising to break with that past, but his premiership has extended it. The first major crack in his stage managed image came in 2022, when the Predator spyware scandal blew open. Investigations showed hundreds of people, ordinary citizens, journalists, opposition figures, and even his own ministers ,under surveillance through a toxic mix of illegal spyware and “legal” phone taps, just after he put the intelligence service under his direct control. The trail led straight to his office. The head of the National Intelligence Service resigned, but no political figures have been prosecuted, and the government hurriedly shut down the parliamentary inquiry in what the opposition called a blatant whitewash.
Barely six months after the Predator revelations, the Tempe train crash on 28th February 2023, shattered what was left of Mitsotakis’s myth of competence. 58 people, mostly students, were killed when a passenger train slammed head-on into a freight train on the Athens–Thessaloniki line, Greece’s worst rail disaster in living memory. From the first hours, the government tried to shrink the story to a single “tragic human error,” throwing an overworked stationmaster to the wolves. Years of warnings about dead signalling systems, understaffing and stalled safety upgrades were brushed under the carpet.
Nearly three years on: no prosecutions, no real consequences. The families of the deceased have become the standard bearers for their dead relatives , staging mass rallies on the anniversary of the disaster and constantly attacking those responsible in the media and in Parliament . One would think that this level of anger and outrage would lead to electoral punishment , but in June 2023 , New Democracy cruised to an easy victory thanks to a divided left wing opposition and so New Democracy became the default government of the country.
Armed with this renewed mandate, Mitsotakis treated the result as a license to rule without restraint. The OPEKEPE scandal, named after the state agency that channels EU farm subsidies , exposed a subsidy system riddled with made up agricultural projects. Billions in EU funds were routed through this machinery while auditors were pushed aside and agency heads who questioned irregularities were removed.
A European investigation describes a systematic, organised fraud operation using OPEKEPE to siphon off Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) funds. Brussels has already hit Greece with a €392.2 million fine and a five per cent cut to future farm subsidies for years of non-existent oversight. This was the straw that broke the camel’s back . After enduring wildfires in the Summer , floods in the Winter , crippling austerity measures, the scandalous actions of the Greek Coastguard who left boats filled with asylum seekers to their fate resulting in many deaths and anger over the Government’s support of Israel’s actions in Gaza: public servants started holding regular strikes, followed by the transport sector and finally the agricultural sector. General strikes have become a regular monthly occurrence and when news of the five per cent cut hit the farmers, they took to the streets, literally . 
This last month they have been blockading the main motorway between Thessaloniki and Athens. Blockading the port of Piraeus. Using their vehicles to bring cities to a standstill . Storming the main airport of Crete and disrupting flights. And when the police try to break up their rallies , they are pelted with anything that comes to hand , even overturning police vehicles as the police flee for their lives . And in the week beginning 15th December, a convoy of tractors numbering hundreds are heading to central Athens and Constitution Square for what will surely be a massive show of public support and a showdown with the infamous riot police.
These actions have not affected opinion polls , this is direct action completely separate from party politics and tribalism. It is the Greek people vs a tyrannical regime that plan to hold onto power until the next scheduled elections in 2027 . Few believe they will last that long , even with the Government’s international friends in the European Union, the USA and Israel. The time has come for a price to be paid and the writing is on the wall . 


Tuesday, December 23, 2025

It's Beginning to Look a Lot Like Christmas…

Shops piled high with festive gifts. Streets festooned with Santas, reindeer, angels and tinsel. Children eagerly waiting for their new toys. Yes it’s beginning to look like Christmas...and it certainly is for the rich who rule the Western world celebrating the birth of the founder of Christianity. For the rich this largely consists of rocking around the Christmas tree snorting coke and drinking themselves silly for days on end. For working people it’s a welcome break from the drudgery of life under capitalism – a brief moment when those who produce all the wealth of this country can stop and enjoy the life the billionaires take for granted every day of their own worthless lives. For others, the homeless, unemployed and destitute victims of the capitalist crisis, it’s just another day of despair. The festive clichés of the politicians and the princes of the church are meaningless to them.
It’s not surprising that Jesus seldom gets mentioned, even by those who claim to worship him. The spirit of Christmas has long been reduced to exchanging gifts and cards, gluttony and drinking. Our rulers now leave Jesus of Nazareth to the tame clergy who reserve their most pious platitudes for the supposed birthday of the ‘Prince of Peace’ in December.
Starmer may be an atheist but many of his cohorts say they are Christians. Back in November 2022, the now deputy premier, David Lammy, stood at the pulpit in St Martin-in-the-Fields in London to tell us that Jesus Christ was the inspiration for his politics as well as his lifelong faith. The then Shadow Foreign Secretary was delivering Christian Aid’s annual lecture on the need for a new, multilateral, and moral approach to international development. But then, and even now, he seems to have forgotten that the Nazarene drove the money-changers out of the Temple and said “it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for someone who is rich to enter the kingdom of God”.
On Christmas the King, the Prime Minister and the Pharisees of the Established Church will lead the chorus in meaningless calls for peace on earth and good will toward to all men. This shouldn’t surprise us. Donald Trump now likes to be thought of as the “President of Peace” – even though he’s done nothing to deserve that acclaim or the Nobel Peace Prize he so fervently desires.
But we are not like them. We stand for genuine peace and real socialism. Peace because only the oppressors and exploiters want war. Socialism because it is essential to eliminate exploitation, unemployment, poverty, economic crisis and war. That’s our Christmas message!

The Trump Trajectory

A frisson of fear swept across the corridors of power in London and the European Union on the publication of Donald Trump’s national security strategy last week.
It admits that “after the end of the Cold War, American foreign policy elites convinced themselves that permanent American domination of the entire world was in the best interests of our country. Yet the affairs of other countries are our concern only if their activities directly threaten our interests.  Our elites badly miscalculated America’s willingness to shoulder forever global burdens to which the American people saw no connection to the national interest. They overestimated America’s ability to fund, simultaneously, a massive welfare regulatory-administrative state alongside a massive military, diplomatic, intelligence, and foreign aid complex”. 
But as the Chatham House imperialist think-tank put it “saving the harshest critiques for Europe’s current trajectory, the 33-page grand strategy pushes commercial ties, strategic stability with Russia, and a strong US hand in Latin America”.
The “Prince of Peace” as Trump styles himself these days tells us that “the days of the United States propping up the entire world order like Atlas are over”. His strategy upholds the concept of  “America First”  defining the national interest solely as the interest of the ruling class. And while it rejects the old theories of global domination
it declares that the main priority of the United States is to “reassert and enforce the Monroe Doctrine to restore American pre-eminence in the Western hemisphere” – which in Trump-speak means the entire Americas from the Arctic to the Antarctic.
The Trump administration seeks to “Make America Great Again”, largely at the expense of its own allies, and boost American manufacturing through tariffs and protectionism while using secret diplomacy and economic blackmail to achieve its goals. Gone are the days of the “special relationship”, the “new world order” and the “project for the new American century”. British and Franco-German imperialism believed that accepting American leadership would give them a share of the spoils. But they didn’t get much out of the fall of the Soviet Union  or the forever wars that followed in Yugoslavia, Afghanistan and the Arab world. Now they’re going to get nothing.
This is what American “isolationism” means. It’s the other side of the reactionary coin – the thinking of those sections of the American ruling class that realise that world domination is beyond their grasp and so seek to restore their hegemony in the Americas  and much of the Global Southwhile maintaining their control of the global oil and energy market.
Whether Trump’s national security strategy becomes the programme for the rest of his term of office remains to be seen. In Washington the isolationists now have the upper hand. The deep state war-mongers are down – but they are definitely not out...

Wednesday, December 10, 2025

The History of an Idea

  by Ben Soton

The West - The History of an Idea by Georgios Varouxakis, Princeton University Press 2025, 512 pp, Hbk: £35:00

The West is more of an idea than a place  and in this book Georgios Varouxakis traces its history. The concept of ‘The West’ can be traced through a series of historical events; the Greco-Persian Wars of the fifth century BC; the division of the Roman Empire into East and West in the fourth century AD and with the Empire of Charlemagne in the ninth century becoming Western Christendom. The idea crystallised in the 18th  and 19th centuries with the Enlightenment and the development of liberty and democracy. There has to be some reference to geography as it is a point on a map; its core is Western Europe and later came to include North America and Australasia. 
According to Varouxakis the idea of the ‘West’ was developed by the French philosopher Auguste Comte.  Comte developed the idea of Occidentalism in which he saw The West as in the vanguard of humanity that, due to its superiority, had been given a leadership role over the rest of the world. Although Comte was a critic of imperialism his ideas have been used to justify actions of imperialist powers from the 19th century onwards whilst the ‘West’. as distinct from Europe, stood in opposition to Russia – which then and still today was seen as Eastern and despotic.         
Varouxakis traces how the idea of the West evolved from the 19th  and 20th centuries to today’s modern world.  He explains how Russia became excluded from the West and how the whole concept came unstuck during the First World War when Turkey and Russia joined the fray. Germany claimed to be defending the West against ‘Asiatic’ Russia while the Entente Powers pointed to the German alliance with Ottoman Turkey. These problems continued through the inter-war years with talk of the decline of the West while toward the end of Second World War the entry of the United States led to increasing talk of the ‘Atlantic Community’ as distinct from the West.  The chapter on the Cold War covers the twists and turns of European and American foreign policy; both in relation to the socialist camp and towards each other.  
The Second World War has often been viewed as a conflict between pro and anti-Enlightenment ideologies with liberalism, represented by Anglo-American and French imperialism,and socialism led by the Soviet Union having their roots in the 18th century ‘Enlightenment’.  Fascism, on the other hand, is opposed to the Enlightenment and the ideas of the French Revolution. 
This is touched upon in the chapter on the post-Cold-War era which states there is a traditional West based on classical civilisation and Christianity and a modern West based on the Enlightenment. It  has even been said that the Cold War was a conflict between the two pro-Enlightenment ideologies of socialism and liberalism – a conflict between liberty and democracy.  
The chapter on the post Cold War era focuses on Samuel Huntington’s Clash of Civilisations and the End of History by Francis Fukuyama. Huntington believed that with the end of the Cold War the West faced new challenges from rival civilisations, which he lists as Islamic, Orthodox, Hindu, Japanese and possibly African and South American. Fukuyama simply claimed that fall of the Soviet Union was the final triumph of the West.            
This book is a history of the idea and not a critique of it. However the twists and turns around what constitutes the West indicate serious flaws with the concept. Some of worst conflicts in history have been between Western powers; not just the first and second world wars but also the Napoleonic wars, the Thirty Years War and the Hundred Years War to name but a few. In living memory the ‘West’ has been used as a euphemism for US-led imperialism and the self-styled Western ‘democracies’ who have been more than willing to support feudal tyrants opposed to secularism or socialism to maintain their hegemony over much of the Global South.

Monday, December 08, 2025

Requiem for a War-Criminal

by Ben Soton

What’s it like to sit down and talk to a mass murderer? To have a chat with Harry Truman, Benjamin Netanyahu or in the case of the film Nuremberg, Reichsmarschall Hermann Göring.
The film is based on the book The Nazi and the Psychiatrist by Jack El-Hai and its main focus is the relationship between the US Army Psychiatrist Dr Douglas M Kelly, played by Rami Malek and Hermann Göring, played by Russell Crowe.
When reviewing this film it is worth comparing it to a previous incarnation; the two-part mini-series Nuremberg released in 2000. In the earlier version all twenty-two defendants were mentioned. In this film there was only mention of five; the lead defendant Hermann Göring, Rudolf Hess, Julius Streicher, Admiral Karl Doenitz and the head of the German Labour Front, Robert Ley. 
At the Nuremberg Nazi war-crimes trial the prosecution team was drawn from all four members of the victorious Grand Alliance – the United States, the Soviet Union, Britain and France. In this film only two of the prosecutors are depicted –Justice Jackson from the USA, played by Michael Shannon and Sir David Maxwell Fyfe, played by Richard E Grant, from Great Britain. Russell Crowe gives an excellent depiction of Herman Göring as a vanquished foe who has lost none of his arrogance emanating from being Hitler’s deputy.
But this is more than just a court-room drama.The film includes a scene where footage of the atrocities committed in the concentration camps is screened as evidence in the trial of the top Nazis to remind the audience, now far-removed from the dark days of the 1940s, of what the Allies were up against in the Second World War.
The psychiatrist Dr Kelly tries to get inside  Göring’s head and is asked to use his understanding to aid the prosecution. He initially argues against this on the grounds of doctor-patient confidentiality. However he then goes on to give information about his interviews to a not unattractive British journalist played by Lydia Peckham while planning to use the information to write a book.
But Kelly’s views on the Nazis were not popular with the US military establishment. He was sidelined and later replaced by Dr Gustave Gilbert, played by Colin Hanks. Although he later became the head of the Department of Psychology at Berkeley his book 22 Cells in Nuremberg did not give him the fame he had hoped for. Though this did not affect his post-war career he  had a drink problem and committed suicide in 1958.
In the final analysis Kelly claimed the Nazis were not unique and that there are people like them in every country, including the United States. On this point he has been proved right more times th
an I can count.

Same old story...


The Chancellor, Rachel Reeves,  says Labour is cutting NHS waiting lists, the cost of living and government debt while boosting productivity, investment and growth. But this week’s budget contained few surprises with spending plans that had largely already been floated in the media by Starmer aides eager to prepare the public for a mediocre financial review that does next to  nothing to end austerity or reverse the decline in the living standards of working people. 
Sure there were some sweeteners in the Reeves budget like the scrapping of the two-child benefit cap. The state pension will rise by 4.8 percent – £440 a year – and by £575 for people on the newer pension scheme.  And the national living wage and national minimum wage will also be increased.
Starmer & Co call on everyone “to make a contribution” to protect public services and help people struggling with the cost of living. But in reality workers will continue to bear the burden of the capitalist crisis in higher taxes and further cuts to what’s left of the public services.

A step too far...

“Trial by jury is a cornerstone of our democracy and an essential safeguard against authoritarianism “ says Jeremy Corbyn. “It is truly frightening that such a fundamental freedom is now under attack. Once rights are lost, they are not easy to win back. We must resist this with all we’ve got”. 
But, incredible it as it may seems,  the Starmer Government is indeed thinking of scrapping jury trials in England and Wales for all but the most serious of cases. Starmer’s deputy, the Justice Minister David Lammy,  is proposing to massively restrict the ancient right to a jury trial by only guaranteeing it for defendants facing rape, murder, manslaughter or other cases passing a public interest test.
The plans, obtained by BBC News, are allegedly an attempt to end unprecedented delays and backlogs in the courts. But juries are founded on the principle of a fair hearing and a trial of one’s peers. They are considered by many, including legal professionals, to be the cornerstone of our criminal justice system. Judges and barristers have joined in the chorus of opposition to this attack on jury trials forcing Lammy to think again.  He now says that “no final decision” had been made amid rumours of a U-turn in favour of  more modest plans for jury-less super-magistrate courts to hear to cases likely to receive a maximum sentence of three years that was originally floated in the independent review by Sir Brian Leveson. 
Abolishing jury trials would clearly dismantle a core constitutional safeguard that has existed for more than eight centuries. It is the first step towards a police-state. But, at the moment,   it also seems to be a step too far for the bourgeoisie as whole to take if the response of the legal community is anything to go by.